Tuesday, August 14, 2007

I Hate Nick Punto


It is time for the Twins organization to figure it out. I know that they’re a franchise that prides themselves on “doing the little things” and playing their own style of baseball: a small-ball, National League-type of game where you move runners around and play for a run at a time. And believe me; I have no problem with this. I think that’s the way everyone should play the game. It’s baseball in its purest form. But the focus on getting players to fit into this mold has gone too far this year and it’s time to make some adjustments.

You simply cannot call yourself a major league franchise with glorified utility players getting regular at-bats, especially when they are complete failures at their job. Yes, I’m talking about Nick Punto. Don’t believe it when Dick and Bert tell you that he’s “a hustle guy” and that his defense is impeccable. Flat out, he is the worst hitter in Major League Baseball and he needs to return to the bench where he belongs. Before last night, Nicky had 3 hits in his last 15 games, good for a robust .100 average (3 for 30). On the season he’s hitting .208, which places him in dead last among all players who have enough at bats to qualify for the batting title. Yahoo Fantasy Baseball currently has him ranked as their 914th best player.

Does he play quality defense? Sure. Is it irreplaceable defense? Absolutely not. Punto makes the highlight reel play from time to time, but personally I wonder if he overdoes it because he knows it’s his only chance of getting any playing time. Most Twins fans will remember the play he had earlier this summer when he was playing second base, charged a softly hit ground ball, and went parallel to the ground as he flipped it to first for the out. I remember thinking at the time that it was an outstanding play. Then the other week I saw virtually the same ball hit to Alexi Casilla. He charged the ball, bare-handed it, and calmly flipped it to Morneau to record the out. It didn’t make SportsCenter or Baseball Tonight; because it was routine, like Punto’s should have been earlier in the year.

You can’t tell me that .200 hitters with a solid glove aren’t available at any level of baseball. A lot has been made of Matt Moses’ (the former future third baseman) struggles over the last year or so in the minors. Has he really struggled to the point that the organization doesn’t think he can even hit above the Mendoza line in the Bigs? Why not bring him up and give him a shot, especially since the Twins are pretty much out of the playoff race now? Why continually let Punto play everyday? It’s gotten to the point now where Nicky can’t even put down a sacrifice bunt. He’s botched two in the last three games. I’ve seen him mess up no fewer than six of these over the last month. Are you kidding me? A .200 hitter who can’t even lay down a sac bunt?

I used to blame Gardenhire for playing Punto as often as he did. But now I wonder if orders are coming down from the front office to play him. After last night’s game, one in which Tricky Nicky failed to get a crucial sac bunt down in the ninth inning, Gardy repeatedly blasted Punto in his post game press conference. His disgust was even evident during the game as the camera panned to him right after the botched attempt. Then I remembered that the team signed Punto to a two year, $4.2 million contract this past offseason. Is it possible that Terry Ryan is trying to validate that ridiculous expenditure by forcing Gardy’s hand and making him play virtually everyday?

We have an expanded roster coming in two weeks. I’m not sure if Brian Buscher is going to be healthy by then, but even if he isn’t, there is absolutely no reason for Nick Punto to be on the field for the rest of the year. In fact, terminate his contract at the end of the year. I don’t care if it costs us a little money. He is not a factor in the future of the franchise and has no business being on the field right now.

Read More......

Monday, August 13, 2007

Five NFL Questions

The Eagan household consisting of Fuzz, Q and Dogg are in the running right now to write the Vikings entry for "USAtoday.com's Blog Squad." Here is an entry from last Friday. We should have posted it last week, but we forgot. If we end up getting the gig, we'll obviously link it to our site here for all of you to view....

Below are five random NFL questions with some emphasis on the Vikings. The three distinguished writers of SuperbowlHomeboy answer each riveting question.

Question #1: Are you gentleman looking forward to tonight’s first preseason game vs. the St. Louis Rams? Any Predictions?



Dogg:
Vikes win in a landslide. We are the type of team that has too many average players that when it comes down to the 4th quarter, we might be playing guys who start for us week 1. The Rams will be playing their freshman team by then. Vikes 44 Rams 10

Fuzz:
Preseason games are worthless to me. They don't mean one thing. The starters usually play two to three series' and then they get benched. Then us rubes have to sit through a bunch of no-names that will be cut in 10 days and pretend we care. The logical move would be to change the channel, but it's football. It's impossible to change it. So, I'm looking forward to the first quarter and that's about it...

Q:
I mean, every football fan looks forward to the first preseason game because football is finally back. It's going to be nice just to see the Purple (and those gawd awful jerseys) on TV. That said, it's the first preseason game and as much as our first team needs to be playing, I just don't see it. Childress and Co. are going to pretend this is a real team and play the starters for a series, two at the most, and then we'll see backups the rest
of the way.

You want a prediction? That by tomorrow morning most of Viking Nation will be calling for Brooks Bollinger to be the starter after he leads multiple scoring drives and T Jack looks like a lost puppy.


Question #2: Preseason football, feel the excitement! Anyways, Brad Childress aka Chilly called all of our plays last year. Only 10 head coaches in the NFL last year called the majority of their offensive plays for their teams. Do you agree with head coaches taking on this huge responsibility? Or should coaches defer to their offensive coordinators like Darrell Bevell for the Vikings?

Q:
Multi-layered question here. I've heard reports that he's going let Bevell call some of the plays during the preseason. Huge mistake. Either he calls the plays or Bevell does. You can't have multiple coaches calling plays throughout the course of a game/season. Different styles, different thoughts, different game plans, etc.

That said, I think the coordinator should always call the plays. He is responsible for the offense. It's in his title. He's closer to the offensive players. Knows strengths and weakness of his players better. Plus, it's his only responsibility. I think you can focus more when it's your sole responsibility to game plan for each Sunday. Head coaches are supposed to be responsible for the entire team and when you're calling plays, that's all you're thinking of. You lose focus on the defense and special teams because you're always trying to figure out your next offensive approach. Let the coordinator do his job.

Fuzz:
I disagree with you Q. I think if the head coach is good enough he has all the right in the world to call the plays. Most of these head coaches are former offensive coordinators anyways. They’re well qualified. Plus, a lot of these coaches have had great success. Gruden, Holmgren and Shanahan have all called plays and their teams have won the Superbowl. Also, guys like Sean Payton of the Saints and Andy Reid of the Eagles have had good playoff success. I think it depends on the coach. If a coach can’t handle the responsibility of overseeing his team and calling the plays, he should be smart enough to hand them off to his O-coordinator. In the Vikings case, I don’t think Chilly can take on both roles so I believe he should pass it on to Bevell.

Dogg:
One guy should call all the plays, period. Whether that’s the head coach or an offensive coordinator doesn’t really matter to me. But if it is in fact the head coach, his duties elsewhere should be reduced. An offensive mind needs the entire week to analyze film of the defense and watch his offense to see what’s going to work on a week-to-week basis. Pick a guy but it better be at least 90% of his job then otherwise your offense will never have a sniff.

Maybe if Andy Reid didn’t call the plays, they would’ve won a SB by now.



Question #3: Q is right, the reports are saying Bevell will be having a tryout period during the pre-season calling some of the plays. Let’s hope he calls 28’s number. That would be our brand new cereal prize, Adrian Peterson. In a sit down interview on Vikings.com he had this to say about his expectations for this year:

“I'm the type of person, I set my bar high. I am not right now just going to throw out any numbers, but I can sit here and tell you I would like to get rookie of the year and MVP. That is just how I set my bar.”

What do you guys think of those comments? Is he too cocky? Or is he right? What do you think are his realistic expectations?

Q:
I hate when people make a big deal out of quotes like this. What's he supposed to say? "Well, I'm just a rookie and I'm not that good so don't expect much." Give me a break. He's confident in his skills and thinks he can succeed. That's exactly what I want to hear.

As for realistic expectations, that's going to completely depend on play calling. How many carries to him and Taylor share? How often is Taylor split out wide? Things like that are going to determine his overall value this year. For now, let's call it 700 rushing yards and 5 TDs.

Fuzz:
Personally, I have a man crush on AP right now. I love him. I love the swagger and cockiness he puts off. He knows he’s good and he just wants people to know that. What’s the big deal is right? However, saying the words MVP might be a little nutso. He’s either on something or onto something with comments like that. Rookie of the year is definitely in reach with our offensive line being one of the better ones in the league. I’m a little more optimistic then my comrade Q. Let’s put him at 1100 total yds and 8 TD’s.

Dogg:
These comments don’t bother me anymore because every NFL rookie that gets taken in the first 4 rounds says that these days. I don’t care what they say but if you do in fact say something like that, you better step on the field immediately and have an impact week 1. You put yourself into a pickle when you say things like that but some rise up to the occasion and are out to prove something and others are just not thinking. Lets hope A.P. is one of those guys who’s out to prove something this year.


Question #4: Along with Adrian Peterson, this years draft had another year of solid offensive stars. For all the fantasy rubes out there gearing up for their fantasy drafts in the coming weeks, what rookies do you think are going to make the biggest splash in fantasy football land this year? Surprises? Busts? Etc…


Which rookie will catch lighting in a bottle like Colston?

Fuzz:
Since I think Adrian Peterson is going to win Rookie of the year with those stats, that’s the first guy on the list. Besides him, keep an eye on these two WR’s: Robert Meachem and Anthony Gonzalez. Meachem is with the Saints and Gonzalez is with the Colts. The Saints and Colts were both in the top five in the NFL in points scored per game last year. So, Meachem and Gonzalez are apart of big time offenses that put points on the board. With Horn gone from New Orleans, Meachem is going to great probably the best opportunity out of any rookie WR to perform well. He’s currently 2nd on the depth chart behind second year guy Colston. He’s going to see plenty of throws his way. With Gonzalez, the obvious comparison is comparing him with Stokley. Manning loves to throw touchdowns and he loves throwing to guys in the slot. Gonzalez might not get the yards or receptions, but he could see a high number of TD’s.

Q:
First of all, I'm calling shenanigans on Fuzz for this question because we play in the same fantasy football league and our draft is tonight. Since I'm the two time defending champion, he's obviously looking to get some free fantasy advice out of me in this not-so-sneaky way. That said...

I love Dwayne Bowe in Kansas City. I know that either Huard or Croyle are going to be the quarterback and that's less than desirable. However, they still will have the specimen that is LJ running the ball and the QB is going to have to throw to someone other than Gonzo and 68-year-old Eddie Kennison, so Bowe could be the man. I too am a Meachem fan. Another guy to watch out for is Chris Henry in Tennessee. As far as I know, they have LenDale White penciled in as the starter. I think that sentence alone is enough to convince you that Henry could get a decent number of carries. Every year a rookie RB comes seemingly out of nowhere to post good numbers, and Henry is my pick to be that guy.

Dogg:
I hate rookies and can never trust them for an entire first season. It’s guys like Colston and Boldin who turn in the monster rookie campaigns. I think it’s nearly impossible to predict any rookies having good years. I would say Calvin Johnson but I thought the same thing for Mike Williams in Detroit. Right now, if I was a fantasy football participant, I would take Michael Bush out of Louisville.

There you go Fuzz. Now stop trying to get my sleeper picks for tonight.

Question #5: Ok, last question. Our favorite NFL felon Pacman Jones just signed to wrestle for the TNA league. He’ll probably just go by Pacman, but if you were about to join a wrestling league, what ring name would you go by?



Q:
Um, wow. Not the hard-hitting, in-depth, NFL-type question I was expecting. I think I'd go with one of the following:
1. "The Bulldog" (not British) because I'm short, stocky, tough to take
down, and tenacious.
2. "Soldier" because, like Kellen Winslow Jr., "I'm a (expletive) soldier!"
3. "The Man" for obvious reasons...

Dogg:
1. “Tank”: Because that is my nickname and it's the name of a fellow Minnesota
Viking.
2. ”Tow Truck”: I can do it all.
3. “Nails”: Len Dykstra would be the best wrestler of all time.

Fuzz:
“Juice”

Out....

Read More......

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Twins Talk: A TKOT Roundtable


In the past couple weeks there have been major swings in optimism and pessimism regarding the current Twins season, as well as the major concerns for the offseason and the future. Because of this, we here at TKOT decided to have a little discussion about what needs to be done concerning the future of the franchise, especially in the next few years as we prepare for the new ballpark and the potential of some very talented Twins teams. The following is the transcript of that discussion:

Fuzz—Here’s a list of potential players and salaries that come off the books next year: Silva- 4.3 million, Rincon- 2 million (we're trying to trade him right now, I assume he's gone), Ortiz- 3.1 million, Rondell White- 2.5 million, Castillo- 5.7 million, Cirillo- 1.5 million. If my math is right, that's 19.1 million. Let's round up to 20 million withPonson off the books as well. We have 20 million next year that will be available. We have to do something with this money. Personally, I think the decision to randomly cut Cirillo and dump Castillo was to clear room for Hunter.

Tank—I used to say cut Hunter, but I say we need him more than anything right now. I think he's our MVP this year. I think we will sign him.

Mr. Cue—As afraid as I am of Hunter getting a big deal from us and then crapping the bed, I think you have to sign him. We have no one in the minors and quality centerfielders are hard to come by. Pay him, pay Santana, pay Morneau, get in the new ballpark, and roll tide.

NBA Fan—We can't pay everybody. Pay Morneau and Santana and take your chances. I don't want to sign Hunter this offseason and then have TR come out and say we don't have the money for the other two.

Mr. Cue—Why not? Like Fuzz said, we've got around 20 million freed up for next year and Hunter is already making 12 million this year. We'd only have to bump that by about 3 million. Then you still have some extra money to finance the other two contracts. All we need is for Pohlad to open that creaky wallet a little more and we'd be fine. Plus, with a new ballpark and the World Series title we'll have in the next couple years, we have plenty of extra revenue coming in.

NBA Fan—Neither Morneau or Santana is going to sign for $5 million per year. Plus Cuddyer's salary is going to go up next year regardless of whether he signs a multi-year deal or goes through arbitration. We eventually have to pay Neshek. I worry that we pay Hunter big for 5 years, but he’s only worth it for 2 years as his body is breaking down. So his last 3 years we pay for very mediocre production. Why not just sign Morneau and Santana and sign a stop gap veteran for a year or two until somebody is ready to take over?

Mr. Cue—Don’t forget that we also have Nathan under contract for a few mil and either we trade him or his contract is up after next year. That's more money we have for guys like Cuddy and Neshek. Plus, Pat can't demand much money yet.

NBA Fan—Neshek is probably not eligible for arbitration until after the 2009 season, but if we sign Hunter to a big deal, it makes keeping other guys tougher, especially since we sign crappy players like Punto, Crain, and Rincon to multi year deals. I just don't think we can start giving big deals to aging outfielders with very average offensive production when we have younger guys who are more productive or have a higher ceiling. I do believe that we could replace .265/25 bombs/80 RBI/.750 OPS with somebody like Kubel if we would ever just play him full time. Remember that it took Cuddyer 5 years to finally play fulltime at one position. You are correct about Nathan, though. His last year as a Twin will probably be next year, and at that time we can use his money (around $6 million, I think) towards Santana, Morneua, or even Neshek.

Tank—Neshek is a set up guy. He won’t get paid that much money. If he becomes our closer, he might get paid a little more, but he’s still young. It’s called increased payroll. They need to figure it out.

Fuzz—Screw this, we're in another 1-0 barn burner as we speak. We need Hunter big time. How can you just let those stats walk and "wait" for a guy for 2-3 years? That's ludicrous. Yes, you might over pay the guy, but without him we're going to be hurting even more. That's not good, especially since we're in the bottom four in the American league in total runs. We can't afford just to let guys walk. I'm with Tank, increase the flipping payroll Carl...

NBA Fan—I would love to increase the payroll. As things stand now though, we are not in a position to pay everybody. Besides, Hunter's been in the middle of our lineup throughout our run scoring drought.

Mr. Cue—Isn’t that a reason to sign him? He’s in the middle of our lineup, hitting .280 with 22 bombs, and we’re still struggling to score. How much worse would it get with someone vastly inferior hitting in his spot?

Fuzz—Exactly! This is making no sense, Fan. Hunter is top 5 in the AL in homeruns and top 7 in the AL in RBI. How would it benefit us to get rid of that with our scoring drought? We need him like a fat kid needs cake. Isn’t that a 50 Cent song?

NBA Fan—That is my point. Why can't we pay somebody $3 million a year to score no runs? Why do we need to pay Hunter $15 million per year to score no runs? It seems to me we are farther away from World Series contention than just one player. Maybe if Liriano comes back next year like he used to be and Garza keeps pitching well, having Hunter will push us over the edge to serious contender. I would much rather pay somebody like Adam Dunn to DH and put Span in center than have Hunter in our lineup, top 5 center fielder or not. I DO NOT want to see Hunter back here next year.

And on that note, we’ll end our debate…for now. Do you have a thought on resigning Hunter (or Morneau, Santana, Cuddyer, Neshek, Nathan, etc.)? Leave us your thoughts in the comments section.

Read More......

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Twins Future=Now


“It hurts doesn't it? Your hopes dashed, your dreams down the toilet”


That’s Teddy KGB talking to Mikey McD. in Rounders, but I think this same phrase can be used for Twins fans everywhere. As short as a couple days ago, Twins fans got a small glimpse of hope. A little crack in the pennant race window. We won a home series versus the division leading Indians and the Detroit Tigers lost their fifth game in a row. We sat only 4 ½ games back of the division. It was super. We were back in the conversation baby. When ESPN showed the standings, our sweet “TC” logo popped up! Side note: Who doesn’t love our logo? I love it. It has to be top five in the league. Thoughts? Anyways, forget the fact that it was at the bottom of the screen, it was still flipping there. “We’re comin, we’re comin” was back in the lingo of Twins fans across the state. It was awesome. Now...



Teddy’s right. It does hurt; it stings real good Mr. KGB. Detroit and Cleveland rattled off two quick wins, while the Twins were baffled by the “talented” Royals pitching, dropping their last two. Side note: You know you have a team hitting problem when you can’t hit pitching from arms that mirror Johnny Damon & Shannon Stewart. Anyways, we’re off the ESPN screen now and on the back burner again. Ohhhh, how quickly things change. This shouldn’t surprise us though. This has been the pattern all year, so the last couple days have simply been a mirage. We were suckered again. It’s sad to say, but we’re not winning the division and we’re not making the playoffs. Yes, I just said it. Take a moment... We might even make a little run in early September, where we climb back within 3-4 games or something like that. But, we’re not going to get over the hump. We don’t have the offense. Period.

That’s why this off-season might be the most important ever in Twins history or at least the last 15 years. I know this is a huge cliché and gets thrown out far too frequently, but it’s true. You have young superstars in their absolute prime right now. That would be Mauer, Morneau, & Santana if you’re wondering. Then you have good ballplayers but not superstars playing well right now: Hunter, Nathan, Neshek and Cuddyer. I mean, wake up and smell the coffee front office! This is your window. You’re getting invaluable experience with your young staff this year. Bonser, Garza, & Baker are all getting quality innings and are all getting familiar with big league hitters. Truthfully, who really knows about Liriano? We can win it without him, but with him, you’d have to put our staff in the top three heading into next year. I don’t think that’s even a stretch. The problem isn’t our pitching though, it’s obviously are hitting.



So...I’m with Santana on this one. Here are his comments one week ago on not attaining a bat:

"That's why we're never going to go beyond where we've gone. It's not just about hope. In a realistic world, you have to really make it happen and go for it.”

Terry, stop signing tools like Ortiz, Ponson, Batista, White, Cirillo and all the other bargain basement puds you pull in every year. We’re sick of it. They all suck and it’s wasting money. Listen to your biggest asset on your team and…go for it! Yes, this might take some convincing of the big swinging dicks upstairs, but make your case. Sell them that spending just a little more money places you in great position to hoist up the trophy at the end of the year. Another side note: The great thing about this is that I know TR is reading this. Huge TK on Toast fan. Huge.

Sign Hunter, bench Punto, bring in one good (proven) bat and another solid bat and let’s roll! I personally think we’re two bats away, not one like most people believe. We’ve been shutout 10 times this year. We need two. This organization seems to be building for the future the last decade. The future is right now ladies and gentleman. I don’t know about you guys, but I want to be sloppy drunk downtown next October for a meaningful playoff run. I want to be at some random bar for every playoff game giving high fives to other baseball nerds and kissing the Twins hotties. It might be a little early to talk about next year and I’m a big enough homer not to give up on this season, but I’m trying to be realistic. TR messed up this year and we all know it. It’s time to fix it.

In the meantime, we have this to look forward to all winter:



How fast can you say #1 pick? Exactly. They’re years away of me being sloppy drunk downtown in June.

Go for it Terry, go for it...

Read More......

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

Training Camp Report


I went to the Vikes training camp this morning and came away with a few quality observations and a few opinions that seem completely valid considering I’ve watched a whole 2 hours of practice. Here’s what I got:

Quarterbacks:
Tavaris Jackson is getting the majority of reps with the first team offense, but Brooks Bollinger is getting a lot more snaps then I thought he would be. Upon closer review of T-Jack, he’s incredibly quick/shifty and has an absolute cannon for an arm (it’s even more impressive in person). That said, he looks extremely uncomfortable in the pocket and seems to get “happy feet” quite often. This is causing him to throw off of his back foot a lot and thus making his passes either short of or behind his receivers. When he does step up in the pocket, his throws are sharp and on the money. The problem is that this does not happen very often. Bollinger, on the other hand, seems very poised in the pocket and a lot less choppy with his feet and delivery. Despite that seemingly high level of comfort, he either doesn’t see the play developing fast enough or is afraid to push the ball down the field. This is resulting in him checking down a lot. I would say that Brooks gives the team the best chance to win right away, but since we’re in a major rebuilding year (with little to no expectations) Jackson will likely be lined up behind center for week 1. Oh, and in case you care, Tyler Thigpen will easily beat out Drew Henson for the third quarterback spot. He actually looks really solid at times, whereas Henson seems like he should be looking for a third baseman’s job instead of a quarterback job.

Running Backs:
AP was not in pads today, which was quite disappointing because I really wanted to see him in person. Chester Taylor probably caught the most balls out of any player on the field today. Everyone has been talking about him getting phased out by Peterson at some point this season, but I just don’t see that happening. He’s running a ton of swing, wheel, and screen routes and I really think the team will use both a lot for the whole year.

Wide Receivers:
As of right now, Bobby Wade and Troy Williamson are starting at wide out (they’re also the two deep men on kickoff returns). Wade is easily the fastest player on the team. He’s another guy who’s very impressive to watch in person, but his hands don’t seem to be very good. Speaking of which, Troy looked very good today. He caught everything thrown his way (including a spectacular 40+ yard sideline catch from Jackson) and seemed to be getting some good separation from the defense. Second round pick Sidney Rice hardly saw any time with the first team offense and it would appear that he’s no higher than fourth on the depth chart right now. The other impressive wide receivers were Jason Carter (some really nice moves, though he is tiny) and my sleeper pick to make an impact, Chandler Williams (ran great routes, saw a lot of balls come his way, and made some very good catches).

Defense:
The defense looked awesome today, completely warranting the hype that we’ve been giving them so far this summer. The linebackers, especially EJ Henderson, were everywhere making plays and our defensive backs were simply dominating. The most impressive guys were definitely fourth round pick Marcus McCauley (who’s now starting at the nickel spot) and Cedric Griffin (completely locked up anyone who came near him). They look like they could be extremely tough this year.

Read More......

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Disaster



At least seven people were killed when an interstate bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota, collapsed Wednesday evening, in what the governor called a "catastrophe of historic proportions."

These type of things are more important in life than sports and entertainment. Tragic events call for all us sports fans to put everything into perspective and realize that the saying "treat everyday as your last day" actually does make a lot of sense when something as bizarre as a bridge collapsing takes place. You never think these type of things will happen in your area but being bloggers from the Twin Cities, we were very close to the action. It's scary and our thoughts and prayers go out to all families affected.

Read More......

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

MN Sports

MN Sports

Whats up with Boston/NE taking our sloppy seconds?

1. First, the Red Sox get Fat Dave after the Twins released him and he goes wild. He is now a borderline HOF'er if he keeps his production up for 4 more years. They also won a WS with him being a major factor.

2. The Bruins get Manny Fernandez from the Wild. He used to be our franchise goalie, but the jury is still out on what he'll do in Boston.

3. The Patriots aquire Randy Moss for absolutely nothing. The Patriots were already good, but with his aquisition and others, they are now the Super Bowl favorites. He is also looking to revive his career, so the chances that he as a good season are pretty good.

4. Lastly, the Celtics aquire KG for some spare parts and a lapdance. This now makes the Celtics the favorites in the Eastern Conference and possibly even the favorites to win it all while the Wolves are quite possible the worst team in the league still lead by the worst GM.

What do the Minnesota Sports franchises have to show for this? A couple of playoff appearances(Twins & Wild), no conference/league titles, and several struggling teams. Our GM's need to be held accountable for all of this. Constantly mis-evaluating talent or refusing to go get talent should not be taken for granted around here anymore. I'm tired of only getting close because we take a misstep somewhere or even having no hope after several personnel errors. I want to see a world champion.



Read More......